Friday, April 5, 2019

Power quality problems

force timbre businesssINTRODUCTION function quality problems yield become serious and common issues that are macrocosm discussed due to its effect on world post governing body networks. Any variation in electric potential, current, or frequency which may lead to an equipment failure or malfunctions is potentially a power quality problem. According to IEEE standard 1159-1995, a potentiality sag is de brothate as a decrease to amongst 0.1 and 0.9 p.u. in root mean square (rms) electromotive force at the power frequency for eras of 0.5 cycle to 1 min.A power schema intermission is a repre directative origin of potency sag and engage been the vast contribution of power quality problems. Other typical causes of potential difference sag includes of starting of large initiation motor, transformer energizing and load changes. When a remains is injuryed, the emf on the grouchy phase will mould to original amount and sometimes drop to zilch. When received voltag e drops to zero, particularly it will become an interruption. Interruption cant be tolerated as it gives a precise bad impact to the utilities. gum olibanum it is essential to ensure that the consumer side will not experience each problems related to the power quality problems. Voltage sags can generally be characterized by sag magnitude, duration and frequency. Voltage sag is a common power quality problem that always occurred in power system network. Voltage sag problems is one of the most serious problems that affecting process industry consumers. repayable to the awareness developed from time to time, consumers and utilities have become concerned with the inconvenience ca utilize by voltage sag.It is important to distinguish between interruptions and voltage sags. Both is a power quality problems but are contrary in terms of occurrence. Interruptions (zero voltage) are mainly occur when a fault occur at the particular bus. Whilst the feeder in parallel that share the same bus will particularly experience voltage sag during the period of a fault for faults in any(prenominal) area of the power system network. The change of location and the extension phone of the faulted voltages may change it to sagged voltage depending on the transformer connections. Voltage sag does not cause any interruption but in the case of sensitive equipment it tends to resulting in shut down of a certain process.This paper is written to describe the coevals of the faulted voltage to other busbar depending on the transformer connections, system fundament and the effect of row duration impedances to the faulted voltages. The purpose of these research is also to extract the features of the travelling and the times of sgged voltage. consequently it is foretaste that the purpose and objectives of this project, an verifiable formula can be developed in monitoring the propagation of voltage sag in every level of dispersion network on the consumer side. Futhermore, this r esearch is intend to contribute to the utilities in improving the existing power quality monitoring system, and to develop a offend at a lower placestanding on voltage sag propagations.Several studies shows that from all types of power quality disturbances known, voltage sags have the most significant severity to consumer equipment. In specified that almost 80% of the disoperation in scattering systems cause the failure and interruptions of power system. The behaviour of voltage sag in embedded generation in distribution networks is discussed in. The study of faults that occurring in transmittal (EHV), subtransmission (HV) medium-voltage (MV), low-voltage (LV) systems and the voltage sags propagate through out the power system can be seen in and is organism concentrated as the frequency of voltage sag occurrences. Focuses on studying the propagation characteristics of sag and harmonics in medium voltage distribution systems by using EMTP manakin, analysing the cause of fault l ocations on sag levels, nature of sag produced by dissimilar types of faults, effects of line length on sag/swell propagation, transformer connection effects on the nature of sag and swells effects, swell propagation characteristics and the total harmonic distortion in different parts of the systems. Discussed in detailed the sag propagation characteristics in medium voltage busbar.Voltage sag is a serious power quality problem such that it can propagates through transformer to all distribution networks and travel to the consumers voltage level.Voltage sags that are caused by symmetrical three-phase faults propagate without changes through transformers but in the case of unsymmetrical faults, however, the transformer connections have a whole effect. Moreover the propagation of voltage sag through transformer that is caused by transmission fault is dependent on the location of voltage source of the transmission system.METHODOLOGYBefore any voltage is existence sent to consumer it is generated in power station. Not all feeders are being installed monitoring equipments. The monitoring equipments are being installed at strategic places where utilities think that have the worst severity at 33/11kV bus feeders only. Thus the data that are being recorded only at the respective feeder that are being install monitoring equipment i.e. 33/11KV busbar. In this situation, it creates several(prenominal) questions on how to acquire the data at different level of voltage busbar. As installing metering equipment and waveform recorders would lead to huge amplifyd costs, alternative method acting to monitor the propagation of voltage sag should be establish. This paper can be divided into several phases. The methodology of this project can be simplified by the flowchart in figure 2. The simulation package that will be used is PSS/ADEPT.Simulation Test arrangingA single line diagram assay system was modeled as in figure 3. Transformers connections in the test system are be ing modeled as accurate as possible with the transformer connections that are being used by the utilities. G1 is a generator producing 11.5kV. The voltage level at B2 and B3, B4 and B5, B6 and B7, B8 and B9 are 275kV or 132kV, 33kV, 11kV and 0.415kV respectively. The transformers connections are being described in put off 1. Transformer and transmission lines parameters for different types of impedances are being described in table II and III respectively. In the vector group of the transformer configurations, capital letter represents the high voltage idle words and small letter represents the low voltage winding. 1 and 11 represents the phase shift in between high voltage and low voltage angle where 1 is -300 and 11 is +300.In the test system single line diagram, the system grounding is being implemented in all of the transformer connection. System grounding is referring to the method of how the entire system or network is being grounded. The grounding in electrical distribution system is being at the Y-connected side of the transformers. The resistor that is being used grounding at TX3 and TX4 is called indifferent(p) Earthing Resistor (NER). The basic purpose of the NER is to protect the transformer from from damaging fault currents fault current by limiting the fault current to be equaled to the transformers capacity or the transformers full load current. Fault fact will be simulated at B5. The propagated voltage through TX3 will be characterized. Different types of transformer and transmission lines parameters will be used to analyze the vulnebarality of the fault event at the neigbouring busbar B4.RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONSPropagated Fault essenceThe simulation faulted results that were being presented was single line to ground fault and double line to ground fault using type 1 parameters for transformer and transmission lines. The results of the simulations are being represented by phasor diagram shown in figure 5, 6 and 7. For all figure the bold li ne represent the primary voltage of TX3 i.e voltage at B5 and for dashed line represents the voltage at the secondary side of TX3 i.e. voltage at B6. convention 6 depicts the situation of a single line to ground fault is being applied at B5 (33kV). The red phase at B5 experiencing an interruption due to the fault but the other two phases experiencing increase in voltage and phase angle jumps. From due to solid grounding stated that sag that is caused by single phase fault is given by the equation in table IV and is sort as type B and after traveling to Dyn11 transformer transform into type C but in this scenario the situation is different because the presence of NER restore the voltage to a normal voltage level at B6 (11kV). Figure 7 depicts the situation when there line to line fault is simulated at B5. The voltage at B5 during this type of fault follows the explanation in but after propagated to TX3 the red phase glowering phase at B6 disappears due to the presence of NER. The voltage during fault may not necessarily drop to zero but the value of the voltage is very minuscule that it can be assumed it reached to zero during fault.Vulnerability of fault eventThe neighbouring bus B4 is of concern when there is a fault. In order to test the vulnerability of the propagation of sagged voltage at the neighbouring busbar B4, the length pf the transmission lines is being increased. The transformer and transmission lines parameters is being changed by the data given in table II and III respectively. In figure 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12 are being presented by two graph where bold line is the voltage at B4 without any fault as the length is being increased where as the dashed line is the voltage at B4 during fault event occurs. the fault that is being simulated is single line to ground fault. In shows that the theoretical calculation of the vulnerability of fault event increase to a constant value. But in this research simulation as the length of the transmission lines is being increased when fault is simulated, the voltage at the neighbouring bus is decreasing due to the voltage drop of the cable length it self. Up to a certain point as the length of the transmission lines is being increased, the voltage during fault and the voltage when there is no fault is moving towards the same value.CONCLUSIONSThe transformer connection and configuration as well as transformer and transmission lines have a crucial role where it gave an impact to the propagation of sagged voltage. It can be seen that when a single line to ground fault event occurs, one phase may not necessary drop to zero but will be sagged and two phases will swelled and the transformer connection Dyn11 NER grounding can mechanically mitigates the problems. But Dyn11 transformer might not necessarily mitigates any fault because it s shown that line to line fault that propagates through it does not mitigates the problems. Consumers that are connected to 0.415 kV may or may not be affected by the fault event as the transformer connections have mitigated the disturbances since the severity of the sag voltage is presence eventhough NER grounding transformer connections is being used. The vulnerability may overcome the severity of sagged voltage but up to a certain point the voltage drop due to cable length may provides under voltage to the power system network. Through transformer connections, the voltage sag propagation can be predicted with empirical formula through continuous observations. As installing monitoring equipment could dramatically increase cost, alternative barbel such as developing empirical formula can overcome this hassle. By having a graceful monitoring method, voltage sag propagation that can cause variety of problems can be apprehended. It is hope through this study and investigation, future development in predicting to develop an empirical formula can be establish.REFERENCESM. F. M. Roger C. Dugan, H. W. Beaty, Electrical Power Systems Quality. New Yor k McGraw-Hill, 1996.IEEE Std. 1159-1995, IEEE Recommended Practise for Monitoring Electric Power Quality, June 1995.IEEE Std 1250-1995, IEEE Guide for Services to Equipment photosensitive to Momentary Voltage Disturbances, Mar 1995.M. H. J. Bollen, Understanding Power Quality Problems, in Voltage Sags and Interruptions IEEE Press, 1999.E. F. P. R. o. P. 309801-1996, Distribution Power Quality Study.E. L. W. H., Ling G. Tu, H. Wayne Hong, W. Zhong, An Intergrated Application for Voltage Sag Analysis, IEE Transaction On Power System, vol. 13, pp. pp 930-935, 1998.J. E. B. R. Billinton, Distribution System Realiability Indices, IEE Transaction On Power System, vol. 13, pp. pp 930-935, 1989.R. Gnativ and J. V. Milanovi, Voltage sag propagation in systems with embedded generation and induction motors, presented at Power Engineering party Summer Meeting, 2001. IEEE, 2001.E. Y. Ahmet Serdar Yilmaz, Behaviour of Embedded GEneration during The Voltage Sags in Distribution Networks, Academi c Journals, 2009.M. L. Pirjo Heine, Voltage Sag Distributions Caused by Power System Faults, IEE Transaction On Power System, vol. 18, 2003.R. V. A. J. Xu, V. Rajagopalan, Propagation of Sag and Harmonics in Medium Voltage Distribution System, IEEE Power Engineering Society spend Meeting, vol. Vol 4, pp. pp 2582-2587, Jan. 2000.J. Xu, R. V. Annamraju, and V. Rajagopalan, Propagation characteristics of sag and harmonics in medium voltage distribution systems, presented at Power Engineering Society Winter Meeting, 2000. IEEE, 2000.D. P. K. I. J. Nagrath, Modern Power System Analysis, 2nd Edition ed. New Delhi, India TATA McGraw-Hill, 1989.M. H. J. Bollen, Characterisation of voltage sags experienced by three-phase adjustable-speed drives, Power Delivery, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 12, pp. 1666, 1997.

No comments:

Post a Comment